Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm
Apr 25, 2017

Gazing Into the Abyss: How USCIS Would Handle an EB-5 Regional Center Program Lapse

The USCIS Regional Center Program is scheduled to sunset this Friday, April 28, at 11:59 PM. To a large extent, we have been here before. The Program’s ongoing status is once again dependent upon reauthorization in a Continuing Resolution (CR) or other spending bill. A new *draft* bill has been leaked by influential senators’ offices. And some lawmakers are drawing red lines that the Program cannot be extended without change again, even though those lines might be crossed.

Does any of this sound familiar? It should. But there is one very different element this go-round: President Trump.

Despite Republican control over each of the political branches of the federal government, Congress appears even at this late hour to lack consensus on what a CR should look like. Over the weekend, Trump and Senior Administration Officials signaled that without funding for a Mexican Border Wall, a shutdown might be possible. Without a CR in place by Saturday morning, the Regional Center Program will lapse, at least temporarily.

So then what happens?

USCIS has not publicly given guidance on this issue for many years – but the topic was raised at two instances in 2009, which provide some guidance.  As first explained by the agency in February 2009, when stakeholders were examining the possibility of a March 6, 2009 lapse:

If the sunset date is not extended, affected Regional Center sponsors and certain Regional Center affiliated I-526 petitioners will not be able to benefit from indirect job creation under the sunsetting provisions[.] No new Regional Center Proposals will be accepted[.] All Forms I-526 received after March 6, 2009 must demonstrate that all ten jobs created will be direct, permanent, full-time (35 hours per week) jobs for qualified U.S. workers.

Clearly, no new I-924s can be filed. From a market standpoint, Pooled Directs accordingly would become *the* option for investors seeking Green Cards and passive roles, especially if the threat of raising minimum investment amounts subside. Entrepreneurial Directs would continue as they have for the past 26 years. USCIS treatment of new Regional Center (RC)-affiliated filings is somewhat obvious, and anticipated by practically every stakeholder in the industry.

The more interesting questions are what would happen with pending Forms I-924, I-526, I-485, and I-829 filings that are affiliated with a now-defunct program. In bracing for a March 2009 lapse, USCIS explained:

Unless the program is extended, USCIS will hold unadjudicated Regional Center proposals and Regional Center affiliated I-526 petitions that were received before the provisions sunset in abeyance for an indeterminate period of time pending further action by Congress. If Congress does not act to reauthorize the Pilot Program, final determinations will be made based on the evidence of “direct” job creation. The decisions will be made based either on the existing evidence of record or in response to a request for evidence, and denials will be issued for any pending Regional Center Proposals.

USCIS has not made a final determination whether it may approve Regional Center affiliated adjustment of status applications after the provisions sunset and it will hold these Form I-485 applications in abeyance pending a final determination or Congressional action. If the sunset provisions are extended, adjudication of the held cases will resume promptly. USCIS will provide further guidance to the public if legislation is enacted to extend the sunsetting provisions.

Four months later, USCIS’s California Service Center (which adjudicated all EB-5 filings before the creation of the Immigrant Investor Program Office) held a stakeholder meeting with AILA and IIUSA on the topic, largely parroting the same positions. AILA Doc. No. 09071362 (paywalled). 

Importantly, for condition removal purposes:

Forms I-829, Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions, whether affiliated with a Regional Center or not, will be unaffected by the sunset of these provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

USCIS is overdue for new guidance to stakeholders on their plans for sunset, especially as pending filings remain at all-time highs. Nevertheless, based on this eight-plus year old guidance, we can predict that the agency will approach the filings as follows, should there be no Regional Center program on April 29:



USCIS’ Action in Absence of Regional Center Program


Application For Regional Center Under the Immigrant Investor Program

  • No new filings
  • All pending held in abeyance for indeterminate time
  • All pending eventually denied without RC Program resumption


Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur

  • Pooled and Entrepreneurial Direct filings unaffected
  • No new filings unless they solely utilize direct hires for job creation
  • Pending RC filings held in abeyance for indeterminate time
  • Pending RC filings eventually adjudicated solely on basis of direct job creation, likely leading to widespread denials.


Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status

  • Unclear. To be on the safe side, those with approved Forms I-526 should file as soon as possible.
  • Pending filings held in abeyance.


Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions

  • No changes, even if Regional Center affiliated and leveraging indirect 100% job creation.



Recent Blogs

Feb 02, 2020

U.S. Imposes Travel Restrictions and/or Quarantines on Recent Visitors to China

According to President Trump’s Proclamation, as of 5:00PM EST on February 2, 2020, the United States will severely prohibit the entry of immigrants and nonimmigrants traveling to the United States within 14 days of having been physically present in mainland China. Learn more in this blog.

Nov 22, 2019

Green and Spiegel Secures Grenadian E-2 Visa for Chinese Client

As a firm dedicated to representing investors and entrepreneurs from around the world, we try to find creative solutions to enable our clients to secure their dreams in the U.S., especially when those options are not readily apparent. We recently had the pleasure of representing Mr. M.L., a successful Chinese businessman who wanted to open an educational company in a major Northeastern U.S. city. Because there is no treaty, ML utilized the Grenada Citizenship by Investment option whereby he was able to secure a passport. Learn more in this blog.

Oct 28, 2019

Matthew Galati To Represent Green and Spiegel LLC at the Seattle 2019 IIUSA Industry Forum

Immigration attorney Matthew Galati will represent Green and Spiegel LLC as he joins Breakout 4, USCIS Policy & Actions: Living in a World of Adjudication Backlogs, RFEs, and NOIDs panel on Tuesday, October 29th at 3:30pm. Learn more in this blog.